Found Richard Masters's account on hereI'd go a step further and say we're a small team.


Found Richard Masters's account on hereI'd go a step further and say we're a small team.
No: it is about his physique and physical presence when he is on the move.Also City aren't a team to do much defending nor rely on height as opposed to composure to get out of trouble.
Gvardiol is a ball playing LCB/LCB not there for his height really.
I’d rather exorcise Wood’s hex myself.Worth starting him vs Burnley, especially with Wood on a hex.
If we have an option on him, might as well give the poor bloke a game hey.
Sent from my EVR-L29 using Tapatalk
I’d rather exorcise Wood’s hex myself.
think its 11m EurosWhat’s the option amount, was that every quoted ?
I’d be tempted to keep him around. Long term deal, reasonable fee, u21 still. Might be worth the investment.
Fee depending of course.
The coaching staff will too after working with him for four or five months - always looked like one for the future, if they do bring him in it will be so he can contribute in the next couple of years.The new chief scout Pedro Ferreira will know all about him and make a judgement
I agree if the price isn't silly. Haven't seen much of him, but from what little I've seen I do think he has something about him (certainly a lot more than Origi anyway).What’s the option amount, was that every quoted ?
I’d be tempted to keep him around. Long term deal, reasonable fee, u21 still. Might be worth the investment.
Fee depending of course.
think its 11m Euros
Agreed, reasonable fee spread over a long term contract.I agree if the price isn't silly. Haven't seen much of him, but from what little I've seen I do think he has something about him (certainly a lot more than Origi anyway).
Probably won't happen, but I'd like to see him start against Burnley (or at least get some substantial time off the bench) and see how he gets one.
Tbf it worked for Southampton in the main, even players like Alcaraz will make them money (when he proves to be like Nadal on clay).FFP concerns still and folk want us to part with £10m on a kid we've seen fifteen minutes of because he made one good pass.
If we're spending our money on players like him in summer then we're on course to get relegated. Nothing against him, just stark reality of a team near the bottom buying inexperienced kids ala Southampton.
Minimal FFP aspect in a potential move like this.FFP concerns still and folk want us to part with £10m on a kid we've seen fifteen minutes of because he made one good pass.
If we're spending our money on players like him in summer then we're on course to get relegated. Nothing against him, just stark reality of a team near the bottom buying inexperienced kids ala Southampton.
Minimal FFP aspect in a potential move like this.
My take is that the loan has given all those at the club a real opportunity to take a look at what he is capable of in order to make an informed judgement as to whether he is worth bringing in for succession planning.We have three more years of £200m odd of amortisation to pay off. Lumping another £10m onto it for an 18 year old untested kid is folly. I see other folk have quoted Murillo and Danilo but they are both older and had senior men's experience to go off, and just because they were good purchases doesn't mean that is the norm. The majority of big money moves for teenagers end up with those players never going for a higher fee.
The other reality is Taiwo struggles with fitness and Wood is ok but you probably don't want to rely on him too often next season. The striker we need to buy needs to be pushing to be first choice alongside Taiwo from the off, not learning his trade whilst his body is still growing.
Same, totally agree.So for me the 10m isn't folly - if the club decide to spend that it's because he has real talent and an incredibly bright future with us, which I assume we will see more and more of until he's our first choice 9.
It's succession planning, and while the academy is going to be in a bit of a lul for a few years while it transitions, is something I can get behind.
While I wouldn't be against him getting some minutes, the sensible thing really would be to do whatever the coaching staff deem is right for his development. If they plan to keep him that is - they'll know what they need to by now you'd think...The sensible thing would be to give the kid a game up front at the weekend. See what he can do then.