It's Baggio
John Robertson
Pedro Neto wore 19 last week but has since changed to 7 after Sterling was dropped. So there must be some scope to change.
Anyone get a programme on Saturday? Were names and numbers on the back?Haven’t seen our squad numbers announced anywhere, so yes, players from game against Bournemouth are now set, but Milenkovic can still change, as can anyone else not listed in the 20 for that game.
Anyone get a programme on Saturday? Were names and numbers on the back?
MeAnyone else's OCD twitching that the lowest active number we have in our squad is now 5?
*Waits for news that they've taken 32 and 23 respectively and watches for a Baggio breakdown.*Morato needs to take #3 & JWP #4.
Anything else and I boycott.
Milenkovic in #4 would be my take.
I think there's precedence for players being allowed to change.I'd accept that if he's allowed to change.
Aina has already changed, from 43 to 34, at a time when 2 and 3 were available - if he was going to change to one of those numbers, I think he would have done it then.With Williams/Aina #2 and #3 of course.
It's very upsetting that 1 and 13 are free and yet our keepers wear 26 and 33. And 2 and 3 being free is irritating despite having loads off full backs.No 1, 2 or 3 is very discombobulating.
Also, both 2 and 3 are iconic at NFFC considering the status of the two most celebrated wearers of the shirt bearing those numbers.It's very upsetting that 1 and 13 are free and yet our keepers wear 26 and 33. And 2 and 3 being free is irritating despite having loads off full backs.