Rockabilly
GAFF LAD. "Open your knees and feel the breeze"
More Gunter money.
It's always the same, someone doesn't agree with something, thinks they know better. I could kind of understand it during Fawaz but it's always some self important, know it all who thinks they speak for everyone.Really not a fan of this Supporters Trust.
Seems to be a group of self important nosey bastards.
Going to a meeting and asking about the clubs finances... they're not exactly going to tell you that we're f**ked and going to have to sell all our players are they!?
I might form a group. The Foam Hand group. We'll have our say, make no mistake.
You'll be able to get a Chicken Bhuna on the concourse, zero segregation, affordable beer, no banning order policy, remove the piss-net below upper bridgford for the visit of Leeds and the Shaggers...
Who's in?
I think it's an important topic to ask questions about because ultimately it's the lifeblood of the club. How the club wish to answer is up to them but if they truly want to 'bring the fans in' on some sort of shared journey then they should expect questions on such an important topic even if they're not mandated to answer like a public company is.Really not a fan of this Supporters Trust.
Seems to be a group of self important nosey bastards.
Going to a meeting and asking about the clubs finances... they're not exactly going to tell you that we're f**ked and going to have to sell all our players are they!?
I might form a group. The Foam Hand group. We'll have our say, make no mistake.
You'll be able to get a Chicken Bhuna on the concourse, zero segregation, affordable beer, no banning order policy, remove the piss-net below upper bridgford for the visit of Leeds and the Shaggers...
Who's in?
I might form a group. The Foam Hand group. We'll have our say, make no mistake.
You'll be able to get a Chicken Bhuna on the concourse, zero segregation, affordable beer, no banning order policy, remove the piss-net below upper bridgford for the visit of Leeds and the Shaggers...
Who's in?
So the new owners inherit a financial shambles, then some pretentious group start knocking the door poking their nose in as if to suggest theres a standard at the club that needs upholding. There isn't, its been shit for as long as I can remember.
All a bit cringeworthy, but fair play to the chairman for giving them the time of day.
It's not the judgement that is important it's asking the question and getting some sort of answer even if it's brushed off a bit.So the new owners inherit a financial shambles, then some pretentious group start knocking the door poking their nose in as if to suggest theres a standard at the club that needs upholding. There isn't, its been shit for as long as I can remember.
All a bit cringeworthy, but fair play to the chairman for giving them the time of day.
It's important therefore that the fans are given some sort of insight into the operations at the club. It's not mandatory but it's what reasonable owners should do.
No one is prodding, some are just keen to understand. If you don't want to, don't care about, or can't understand the finances then by all means feel free to ignore but others should be able to get a feel for it.Its not important to everyone & that's my issue with this organisation as a whole. They dont seem to care for those of us who aren't keen on a self entitled few prodding the owners.
I'm in favour of fans being welcomed by the club, but if you think you're going to get anything but an opaque answer to your questions, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
Their latest update, on if the club were planning to revisit the options offered:
"We're checking but our assumption is (& always was) that the contingency is already built into the current options. As the FAQs cover, the club will look at compensation for Opt 1 takers if a large portion/all of the season is BCD. We'll share updates, if any, as soon as we can.
We're discussing with the club as a matter of priority, as soon as we know more we'll share updates. Prob worth hanging fire until end of the day anyway, to give them time to assess."
Feels like the first time I've said this, but, I'm not sure what you're expecting from the club or what they've done wrong here?
Option One was clear in that you'd enter a ballot if and when some capacity was restored with an iFollow code provided for games where no fans were allowed in.
It was always likely Coronavirus cases would creep back up at some point and harsher restrictions may be needed. Surely folk thought about this before choosing their option? I specifcally picked option two because despite wanting to be part of the ballot, I suspected the number of games we'd actually have a ballot for would be quite low and I didn't have interest in the iFollow passes. Also, it's the Government changing their mind on this, not Forest.
In short, if you wanted a refund, you should have selected that.