Matt
Stuart Pearce
Posted decent numbers for Watford but they’ve sent him back to Man U - us and QPR allegedly keen to sign him on loan for the rest of the season
James David Garner
- Thread starter Matt
- Start date
Re: James Garner
That might be worth a gamble.
That might be worth a gamble.
Ravi
Upper Decker
Re: James Garner
Bit of a Maverick.
Bit of a Maverick.
Rockabilly
GAFF LAD. "Open your knees and feel the breeze"
Re: James Garner
I prefer Jim Rockford.
I prefer Jim Rockford.
Re: James Garner
A number of younger posters are going to have to go through the files to get these references.
A number of younger posters are going to have to go through the files to get these references.
congo_red
Ale ape.
Re: James Garner
More chance of Joe Garner. Again.
More chance of Joe Garner. Again.
Redemption
Tactical Flexibility
Re: James Garner
Maybe it won't happen and we'll look back on this window as The Great Escape.
Maybe it won't happen and we'll look back on this window as The Great Escape.
Matt
Stuart Pearce
Carlos
Massive Member
Re: James Garner
The wrinklies are out again!
The wrinklies are out again!
Rockabilly
GAFF LAD. "Open your knees and feel the breeze"
Re: James Garner
So are the Space Cowboys.
So are the Space Cowboys.
congo_red
Ale ape.
uck:
Redemption
Tactical Flexibility
Re: James Garner
We'll likely know more in 36 Hours.
We'll likely know more in 36 Hours.
Carlos
Massive Member
Phooey
Jack Armstrong
Re: James Garner
I read his autobiography, he led a full life
I read his autobiography, he led a full life
Heffing Psycho!
Steve Chettle
Re: James Garner
Seeing some of the regular Twitter moaners who were in meltdown over the club signing "yet another past it 30 year old" in Dan Gosling now bitching and moaning about us potentially signing this lad because "why don't we just use our own kids instead of loaning somebody else's!?"
Swear some of these people would be over the f***ing moon if we got relegated as long as the team was full of 18-21 year olds exclusively from the academy.
Seeing some of the regular Twitter moaners who were in meltdown over the club signing "yet another past it 30 year old" in Dan Gosling now bitching and moaning about us potentially signing this lad because "why don't we just use our own kids instead of loaning somebody else's!?"
Swear some of these people would be over the f***ing moon if we got relegated as long as the team was full of 18-21 year olds exclusively from the academy.
Otis Redding
Try A Little Tenderness
Re: James Garner
I'd be intetested to know HP how many of these deluded souls have actually watched any of the "kids" they're demanding to see in the first team, beyond Mighten and Swan?
I'd be intetested to know HP how many of these deluded souls have actually watched any of the "kids" they're demanding to see in the first team, beyond Mighten and Swan?
Ashley
Steve Chettle
Re: James Garner
Don't really know much about this lad, but he's made 20 appearances for a side currently 3rd in the Championship so I assume he must be somewhat decent (even if he is now deemed surplus to requirements at Watford).
Don't really know much about this lad, but he's made 20 appearances for a side currently 3rd in the Championship so I assume he must be somewhat decent (even if he is now deemed surplus to requirements at Watford).
Bob Fossil
Nottingham's dirty secret
Re: James Garner
Haven't seen him play but from what I've read he seems to be a bit of a classy operator and the Watford fans were raving about him. Initially anyway.
Haven't seen him play but from what I've read he seems to be a bit of a classy operator and the Watford fans were raving about him. Initially anyway.
Red bandit
Geoff Thomas
Re: James Garner
Anyone who pays the slightest attention to fans comments on someone who is leaving their club is seriously deluded.
Anyone who pays the slightest attention to fans comments on someone who is leaving their club is seriously deluded.
MC Plantpot
First Team Squad
Re: James Garner
I wonder whether your Watfords and Bournemouth almost have an elevated opinion of themselves when they’re back in the league to where they belong. You only have to read their forums when they’re losing, to see how deluded they are and how they expect not to be operating at the level they are.
So, it’s easy to see why, especially when they’re not 100 points clear at the top of the league (which they bloody well should be), players are labelled as shit.
Perhaps we are similar ?
I wonder whether your Watfords and Bournemouth almost have an elevated opinion of themselves when they’re back in the league to where they belong. You only have to read their forums when they’re losing, to see how deluded they are and how they expect not to be operating at the level they are.
So, it’s easy to see why, especially when they’re not 100 points clear at the top of the league (which they bloody well should be), players are labelled as shit.
Perhaps we are similar ?
thehockleyhustler
Stuart Pearce
Re: James Garner
Apart from Antonio, the views of the fans of the losing club have been pretty spot over the last few years when taken as a whole.
For me it's been a good gauge of what we are getting.
Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk
Not sure I agree with that.
Apart from Antonio, the views of the fans of the losing club have been pretty spot over the last few years when taken as a whole.
For me it's been a good gauge of what we are getting.
Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk