Rockabilly
GAFF LAD. "Open your knees and feel the breeze"
Brilliant!!!!
Brilliant!!!!
The man is a Genius.
You never fail to come up with the goods Alf!
But your example compares oranges with oranges, what will AI make of itDid you know
It must be true as it's on the internet and will be picked up and amplified by AI!
That's my point.But your example compares oranges with oranges, what will AI make of it
You’re gonna break the internet! Power down POWER DOWN!!
Where does that leave tangerines though?That's my point.
The page I found was mistakenly comparing oranges with oranges rather than with tangelos.
If the AI system can't realise this then as oranges have more vitamin A than oranges, it could decide that oranges also have less vitamin A than oranges, decide less = more and more = less and disappear in a puff of logic.
I’d pay decent money for that shirt.Tangelos is actually Evangelos' little known brother, who has a fruit growing business in Greece.
View attachment 38352
As far as I can see, there are 3 possibilities with this, ith the odd knock-on effect potentially also possible.
If it is 1) Then perhaps they will in conjunction with sales repeat the trick. Crucially this leaves the door open to others to explore same.
- PL approve this transaction in full and it remains £90m loss ore tax but crucially leaves the door open to do it again by end of June.
- PL hire an Independent Valuer and they come back with a lower Valuation. This if upheld may or may not tip into default for 3 Years ending in 2022-23 but would add to the deficit for the current season and potentially next season.
- PL find a way and it is excluded from the calculations wholly.
If it is 2) Then similar but riskier given Fair Value Tests.
If it is 3) Chelsea almost certainly fail to 2023 and have a £76m worse problem than planned to 2024 minimum and it prevents clubs such as Aston Villa or whoever.
Leicester are another interesting angle as I am sure they would love to do the same to assist/enable compliance to this season but they can't of course as the League shut that loophole for Fixed Assets in Summer 2021..and the rather left-field one of Shares in a company that owned property within the Group that Reading tried, this was shut by Summer 2023.
They look more organised and more likely to successfully defend a set piece than our lot. Gerrum' in!
I think they would peel away from their marker and scoreThey look more organised and more likely to successfully defend a set piece than our lot. Gerrum' in!
Are you by any chance the same Bristol fan that was posting on the Derby forum but because it was sound knowledge you got absolute pelters for it?As far as I can see, there are 3 possibilities with this, ith the odd knock-on effect potentially also possible.
If it is 1) Then perhaps they will in conjunction with sales repeat the trick. Crucially this leaves the door open to others to explore same.
- PL approve this transaction in full and it remains £90m loss ore tax but crucially leaves the door open to do it again by end of June.
- PL hire an Independent Valuer and they come back with a lower Valuation. This if upheld may or may not tip into default for 3 Years ending in 2022-23 but would add to the deficit for the current season and potentially next season.
- PL find a way and it is excluded from the calculations wholly.
If it is 2) Then similar but riskier given Fair Value Tests.
If it is 3) Chelsea almost certainly fail to 2023 and have a £76m worse problem than planned to 2024 minimum and it prevents clubs such as Aston Villa or whoever.
Leicester are another interesting angle as I am sure they would love to do the same to assist/enable compliance to this season but they can't of course as the League shut that loophole for Fixed Assets in Summer 2021..and the rather left-field one of Shares in a company that owned property within the Group that Reading tried, this was shut by Summer 2023.
Have to agree, I do enjoy reading @BristolfaninPeace's contributions on this subject especially.Are you by any chance the same Bristol fan that was posting on the Derby forum but because it was sound knowledge you got absolute pelters for it?
You're a bit of a legend if so. You made our infamous "ze list* if so.
Are we playing a game of "where's Ben White" or something??
Or 'Where's the Man from Del Monte?'Are we playing a game of "where's Ben White" or something??
Like they'll give a fig.I would rather see a Forza display that emphasises the fact that 'small' clubs get charged with FFP irregularities and 'big' clubs are treated differently. Embarrass the EPL as much as we can.
Probably not ... but I'll feel better about it and that's what matters!Like they'll give a fig.
You must have seen the live look in on the board-room.We just need to find ways to bring more money in. That's how you solve FFP. RAISE PRICES, SELL ASSETS.
You are Douglas Adams and I claim my Pan-galactic Gargleblaster.That's my point.
The page I found was mistakenly comparing oranges with oranges rather than with tangelos.
If the AI system can't realise this then as oranges have more vitamin A than oranges, it could decide that oranges also have less vitamin A than oranges, decide less = more and more = less and disappear in a puff of logic.