What The Majority wanted to hear on the World Cup Bid

Randy Bumgardener

AKA Randy Bumgardener
I've highlighted the bits of interest !

Linky

THE city council was set to officially approve Nottingham's 2018 World Cup bid today.

The authority will contribute £50,000 to help cover the costs of the bid, which seeks to make Nottingham one of the host cities if the Football Association is successful in bringing the tournament to England.

Notts County Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council will make similar contributions.

All three council have committed to work together to develop the bid, and they have provided members of staff for project teams working on it.

However, in papers submitted to Nottingham City Council's Executive Board, officers make clear that one of the biggest risks to the success of the bid is the building of an adequate stadium.


They emphasise the challenge of delivering a new ground, with an outline planning application "probably two years away" and the difficulty of redeveloping the City Ground in line with Fifa requirements.
The city council papers state: "Nottingham and Nottinghamshire can demonstrate a strong offer in many of the bid requirement areas.

"It is also considered that Nottingham and Nottinghamshire is well placed having staged many international sporting events which can be combined with a strong football pedigree and heritage

"The review identifies that the current stadium is however not fit for purpose and research regarding the current status of readiness to deliver a new offer is at very early stages."


Fifa's technical specification for host cities require a stadium with a capacity of 45,000 seats, as well as space around the ground for extensive facilities, such as a media centre.

Since September, Nottingham Forest have been speaking to all three local authorities about proposals to move to a new stadium, possibly in the area between Lady Bay and Holme Pierrepont.

The stadium would be part of a new "sports quarter", featuring extensive facilities for local people.

But a review of Nottingham's state of readiness to host the tournament, undertaken by Nottingham Development Enterprise, has made council officials cautious.

Council papers quote the NDE report as saying: "The exact site has yet to be confirmed for the stadium and a full business plan is required. Flooding issues need to be resolved and a funding package assembled, therefore an outline application is probably two years away."

The papers add: "Although this does not necessarily mean that the new stadium project may not be pursued, it is highly likely that by the time the formal host city bid has to be submitted (November 2009), that little will have occurred to significantly address the issues highlighted.

"It would therefore seem prudent and responsible to encourage an alternative contingency option to be pursued. In particular a redevelopment of the current City Ground, although not without considerable difficulties, could be a possible alternative."


Coun Kay Cutts, the Conservative leader of Notts County Council, has stated that she would favour redevelopment of the City Ground.


The city council papers state: "The county council is not minded to support any proposed new stadia beyond the existing urban area, but supports the view that the redevelopment of the existing City Ground site should be explored as a priority."


A survey of 233 people in West Bridgford, Gamston, Radcliffe-on-Trent and Cotgrave, undertaken by the Evening Post, found marginally more in favour of a new stadium and sports quarter than against.
 

Randy Bumgardener

AKA Randy Bumgardener
At least we know that the idea of redevelopment is a preffered option with a fair few in the council ! Can't wait to see the suggestions if that option is fully investigated !
 

adam09

Bob McKinlay
To be honest I wouldn't be adverse to a new ground, if it provides a lot of nice sporting facilities for the general public too (much like the ice Arena) and as long as it doesn't turn out like a shithole like the Walkers or Ricoh.
 

nigelnffc

First Team Squad
adamski said:
To be honest I wouldn't be adverse to a new ground, if it provides a lot of nice sporting facilities for the general public too (much like the ice Arena) and as long as it doesn't turn out like a s**thole like the Walkers or Ricoh.

it probably would though, so better to be safe and hopefully redevelop th CG, maybe its just me but i would have little faith in us building a new ground that would be a place we would all love like the CG
 
W

winnits

Guest
The City Council own the land the ground is on, I can imagine Forest leveraging this nicely to become the owners of the land as part of the arrangements which would be a nice move - particularly given Doughty's acquisition of the surrounding land making it somewhat valueless unless he plays ball with any future developments anyway.
 
C

clusternakker

Guest
2012, olympics, Weve got the RUWC 2015, 2018 world cup? we are shafting some heirachy, who is it?
 
W

winnits

Guest
We've not hosted a World Cup since 1966 though, have we? So it's about time :p

The last Olympics here was in 1948.

As for the egg chasing, nobody really cares about that anyway :p
 

ThePatriot

First Team Squad
I don't understand why they don't do 2 in 1 jobs and under the seating of the upper tiers put major shops so that it doubles as a retail park. Mself, loving fooball and hating shopping knows the wife wouldn't want to miss a game. One side Tescos, the other M&S, at either end Next and Next outlet. Upper floor of ground starbucks, mac d's, kfc, wetherspoons and post office to cash giro's and satisfy ebay power sellers. Throw in a dentists, doctors and opticians and I think all is sorted.
 
M

Monk De Wally De Honk

Guest
We could have a nice new stadium and share with our little brothers down the lane...
 

nffcman1

A. Trialist
aren't we going to need a new stadium in about 10_15 years or so anyway? wont be safe or something..
and am i right in saying the council will be funding it? so if we don't have 1 now we will have to pay ourselves!

personally i would rather stay put...but a new stadium will attract players better facility's attract fans etc
 

pearce1

A. Trialist
Winnits said:
We've not hosted a World Cup since 1966 though, have we? So it's about time :p

The last Olympics here was in 1948.

As for the egg chasing, nobody really cares about that anyway :p

What we care about the olympics do we a bunch of stuck up to**ers with lottery grants for riding a bike etc
 
Top Bottom