We should

We should..

  • Move to Gamston, as long as we don't have to share it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Move to Gamston either way

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stay at City Ground

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Marshall.

Jack Burkitt
Undecided.
 

Spring Heeled Jack

Spring Heeled Jack
Stay at the ****in' City Ground! There's naff all wrong with the place (except a dodgy Main Stand.)

Still, our wonderous Chairman, Mr Success, is determined to move the club, so he and his crooked little friend Councillor Collins can build luxury flats or some shit.
 

zigga-zagga

Viv Anderson
trentside trevor said:
Stay ! I do not want to see Forest playing in a soulless car park like pride less park or the crisp bowl. :mad:

A ground is what the fans make of it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Pride Park or the Walkers Stadium's design but, obviously, they compare very badly with the Baseball Ground and Filbert Street for atmosphere. The major problem when a club gets a new ground is that there is never a 'designated' home end, such as the Trent End, Pop Side, Kop etc. As a consequence of this the vocal support gets spread thinly around the ground and the atmosphere suffers.

The City Ground facilities are basic, bordering on primitive, the access and egress is diabolical and, whilst I agree that it looks good on the banks of the Trent, that very feature in itself limits the possibility of improvement.

After supporting the Club for 42 years I, for one, will not bemoan the demise of the City Ground and hope that we proceed with all haste.
 
R

removed user

Guest
...be dancing....yyeeeaahhh

:banana: :banana:
 

Maverick

Jack Burkitt
zigga-zagga said:
A ground is what the fans make of it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Pride Park or the Walkers Stadium's design but, obviously, they compare very badly with the Baseball Ground and Filbert Street for atmosphere. The major problem when a club gets a new ground is that there is never a 'designated' home end, such as the Trent End, Pop Side, Kop etc. As a consequence of this the vocal support gets spread thinly around the ground and the atmosphere suffers.

The City Ground facilities are basic, bordering on primitive, the access and egress is diabolical and, whilst I agree that it looks good on the banks of the Trent, that very feature in itself limits the possibility of improvement.

After supporting the Club for 42 years I, for one, will not bemoan the demise of the City Ground and hope that we proceed with all haste.

Got to disagree, to an extent, for once. The grounds you mention may be OK (although I think not) How many out of town gropunds do we go to with no "old time" facilities. McD, KFC, Starbucks nowhere to park except where you are sent (£8 or park and ride at Reading)
I want the City Ground to be re-vamped so I can park where I like, if I choose, come on the tram, if I choose, walk from the station, if I choose, and have a choice of pubs and chip shops.
 

Timothy Pope

Just another roll of the Dyche
Maverick said:
Got to disagree, to an extent, for once. The grounds you mention may be OK (although I think not) How many out of town gropunds do we go to with no "old time" facilities. McD, KFC, Starbucks nowhere to park except where you are sent (£8 or park and ride at Reading)
I want the City Ground to be re-vamped so I can park where I like, if I choose, come on the tram, if I choose, walk from the station, if I choose, and have a choice of pubs and chip shops.

Spot on!

But you're looking at it from a 'fans' perspective. Unfortunately the decision makers won't be.
 

Rich

Rice IV
I wish there was a Starbucks at the City Ground.

I love Starbucks.
 

Maverick

Jack Burkitt
Rich. said:
I wish there was a Starbucks at the City Ground.

I love Starbucks.

I'll grant you a Starbucks then, but not to the exclusion of all the other traditional food and drink outlets :p
 

cknu

Viv Anderson
zigga-zagga said:
A ground is what the fans make of it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Pride Park or the Walkers Stadium's design but, obviously, they compare very badly with the Baseball Ground and Filbert Street for atmosphere. The major problem when a club gets a new ground is that there is never a 'designated' home end, such as the Trent End, Pop Side, Kop etc. As a consequence of this the vocal support gets spread thinly around the ground and the atmosphere suffers.

The City Ground facilities are basic, bordering on primitive, the access and egress is diabolical and, whilst I agree that it looks good on the banks of the Trent, that very feature in itself limits the possibility of improvement.

After supporting the Club for 42 years I, for one, will not bemoan the demise of the City Ground and hope that we proceed with all haste.

I have to agree with that, even though its only been 30 years since I stood on the Bridgford Terrace on my milk crate.

I miss the atmosphere we used to have at the City Ground when the Trent end was the focus and then the following stands followed suit. We had our fans behind BOTH goals. We stuck the away fans in a corner out the way.


Besides we should campaign for a Greggs at teh new stadium and then half of you will be happier
 
Top Bottom