I suppose the only comparison I can make is imagine if there was a World Cup of Ice Hockey and the USA couldn't find their own coach so instead had to employ one from Canada or Russia.I really truly don’t understand the negative reactions towards this, the “has to be the same nationality” responses really don’t make sense in my head.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jules Rimet bleibt glänzend!Drei lowen auf einem trikot
I dont think you have thought about it deeply than. I am on the side that I dont mind a non British coach but I can understand the principle that it should be your countries best vs anothers. It makes completes sense and to be honest its a prnciple that is being eroded in sport which needs to be protected especially when it comes to eligibility rules for players. So I can understand the sentiment and its definelty not "Xenophobic" and the other stupid exagerrations that people are painting out. Its just 2 valid opposing views thats all that comes down to preference. I think the manager falls outisde the principle of our best vs your best but its completely understandable by why people would want to include the manager in that.I really truly don’t understand the negative reactions towards this, the “has to be the same nationality” responses really don’t make sense in my head.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
England lose on penalties ….What happens now if we play Germany in a knockout game?
These are all spurious comparisons though, because Tuchel's percentage was given only for cup competitions. It's much easier to have a high win ratio in cup competitions than in the league, because there's no possibility of draws.The English candidates for the England manager's job before Tuchel was appointed, and their overall win ratios at club level:
Graham Potter: 40.5%
Eddie Howe: 44.25%
Lee Carsley: 40%
Frank Lampard: 32.72%
Steven Gerrard: 45.6%
I'd tell you to get out but this is more your place than mineEngland lose on penalties ….
For me its not even about it having to be 'England's best' or whatever, although I suppose that is important.
Its about the England vs Germany football rivalry. Growing up I felt that even stronger than Forest vs Derby. It was just one of those all encompassing things like the FA cup final that seemed to matter to absolutely everyone when I was young.
Back in the 90s, there wouldn't even be a momentary lapse in which someone even imagined England having a German manager.
These days no-one gives a shit and all that stuff is just getting thrown out of the window and I dunno... It just kinda makes the game worse. Just another step in the ceaseless middle-classing of football.
What happens now if we play Germany in a knockout game? Win or sack Tuchel? Its an easy way to forever lose the trust of the fans in one game anyway.
And England are the Leicester in the equation.As rivalries go though, I believe it's more akin to Forest/Leicester then Forest/Derby.
Yup, but f*** the french still though right?France was our "traditional" enemy up until WW1. "We" would have lost at Waterloo without both our own German troops and Blucher's.
The French are not our enemy, and the Germans have long got over WW2, it's time we did as well.
The Germans realised that their main enemy was how the country was configured for the benefit of a war mongering elite, many of whom were then happy to sponsor the Nazi ideology.France was our "traditional" enemy up until WW1. "We" would have lost at Waterloo without both our own German troops and Blucher's.
The French are not our enemy, and the Germans have long got over WW2, it's time we did as well.
I don't hate the Germans, in fact its my favourite country to visit and I love the place.France was our "traditional" enemy up until WW1. "We" would have lost at Waterloo without both our own German troops and Blucher's.
The French are not our enemy, and the Germans have long got over WW2, it's time we did as well.
I didn't say you didI don't hate the Germans, in fact its my favourite country to visit and I love the place.
I just happen to enjoy a football rivalry. They don't have to be based on actual hate you know.
Yeah I get what you're saying.I didn't say you did
but it is ridiculous that some people can't see past Tuchel's passport, particularly when some of them are blatantly just doing it for the grift.I don't hate Derby or people from Derby
Also depends on who you manage., Tuchels only non big side was Augsburg. I like stats I think they get unduly derided but you have to try and place stats in context and use your eyes as well.These are all spurious comparisons though, because Tuchel's percentage was given only for cup competitions. It's much easier to have a high win ratio in cup competitions than in the league, because there's no possibility of draws.
Edit - just googled, his win ratio in all competitions is 57%. Still impressive then!
Thats my point as well, its ridicilous to get on your high horse about not caring about nationality in "Internationl" footy. I dont agree that the manager has to be English but I am not gonna score cheap political points and call people Xenophobic who do. When in fairness they make salient points that I struggle to argue against. I just feel that the manaement role falls outside the need to be English but I totally understand what others would get upset about it.Yeah I get what you're saying.
I guess it just feels wrong. It'll probably become normal after a short while though.
On the other hand, could you not say the same thing about the players? Why are we so bothered about their passports? Surely the players should be allowed to choose whatever country they feel like representing. If we're going to start to disassociate national identity from the international game we may as well just have a Premier League best XI or something.