I think spending a bare minimum of £100m+ as a promoted team is an obligation now. Whether you actually compete or not will depend on whether you spend that money wisely or not.
Not bothered really as long as the winner causes Sheffield tears at Wembley. Both proper clubs with an old school feel about them, better than tinpot shite like Brentford and Bournemouth.
Coventry in the top flight just reminds me of the good times.
Promising attack peters out: attacking team has to do better there. It was easy to score.
Makes Don Goodman sound knowledgeable…
100% - still prefer him to Hinchcliffe…
) Sunderland have the potential to make a better fight of it, given their stadium, fanbase etc and Cov could potentially be the new Southampton whipping boys.
They'll both struggle big time handicapped by the PSR bollox and not having a squad anywhere near Premier league quality.I'm torn on my preference. Let's say one of Coventry or Sunderland went up (screw you Blunts) Sunderland have the potential to make a better fight of it, given their stadium, fanbase etc and Cov could potentially be the new Southampton whipping boys.
On the other hand it would be nice for Cov to get up given the shite they've been through in recent years.
Sent from my SM-S928B using Tapatalk
Promoted teams should get additional allowable losses in the first year they come up, not less. It will never get voted through though, especially now that a few clubs this year have been down there. Had those promoted clubs had any sort of additional quality they would have been bang in trouble.
