Eddie Yates
Ian Bowyer
If you've got a point to make Pynch then make it instead of posting bollocksWhat? Perhaps.
If you've got a point to make Pynch then make it instead of posting bollocksWhat? Perhaps.
I am a referee. I only know and understand bollocks. And hockey.If you've got a point to make Pynch then make it instead of posting bollocks
I am a referee. I only know and understand bollocks. And hockey.
It’s really simple. VAR check things in the lead up to the goal. Sometimes they check things that never even look contentious. So when a decision is contentious and they guessed at from 70 yards, why wouldn’t they check it and rule it out? The wrong decision led directly to the goal.So if the corner just passed without incident and the game carried on would we be discussing it today? Of course we wouldn't.
We had a corner in the second half that hit Ndoye last. He was actually stood offside too just to add to the poor decision-making. Now he was stood next to a defender so it wasn't really clear if the ball had hit him or the United player and I would imagine the ref probably guessed again to be honest. Nothing is being made about that on here though weirdly...
They should just allow you to fight for a decision.They should introduce the same offside rule in to football as they have in ice hockey, would make life easier![]()
And maple syrupI am a referee. I only know and understand bollocks. And hockey.
They should just allow you to fight for a decision.
Candidly, watching two footballing pansies get in a fistfight would probably be the funniest shit ever. When you see scrums in a football match they are almost always reminiscent of a grade eight girls fight.There used to a website called dropyourgloves.com which was excellent for seeing them, could have a footie equivalent like dropyoursnoodes.com or something like that.
Puts you ahead of the wakners we get anyway.I am a referee. I only know and understand bollocks. And hockey.
I don't disagree with that, by all means check the corner and disallow if necessary although what I would say is that the best angle available for this incident yesterday isn't great. There's no camera looking straight down the line so once again we're guessing albeit with a better angle than the linesman had. Are we also doing this for free kicks too? And long throws which are basically like a corner now? I thought the idea was that we have less VAR involvement not more...It’s really simple. VAR check things in the lead up to the goal. Sometimes they check things that never even look contentious. So when a decision is contentious and they guessed at from 70 yards, why wouldn’t they check it and rule it out? The wrong decision led directly to the goal.
The non corner we got didn’t, just like an offside that doesn’t lead to a goal isn’t checked.
If the ball had gone out and we’d gone up the other end and scored from it they would check it, and that could be a minute earlier.
Talk to immigration. Tell them a 62 year old Canadian with dodgy knees AND dodgier brain can save the English Prem.Puts you ahead of the wakners we get anyway.
I've thought that for years, but with VAR you'd still have the same bollocks going on, just in a different way. And the ball is so big in comparison, would it be the front of the ball etc.They should introduce the same offside rule in to football as they have in ice hockey, would make life easier![]()
I've thought that for years, but with VAR you'd still have the same bollocks going on, just in a different way. And the ball is so big in comparison, would it be the front of the ball etc.
Dodgy brain is another step up, you're in.Talk to immigration. Tell them a 62 year old Canadian with dodgy knees AND dodgier brain can save the English Prem.
Do you guys have Spanish Villas in Nottingham, including private golf course and kebab truck?Dodgy brain is another step up, you're in.
No but we've got council flats in StrelleyDo you guys have Spanish Villas in Nottingham, including private golf course and kebab truck?
I don't know what Strelley is but it sounds a great place to live. Btw, off to referee an under 17 boys team where the coach absolutely hates me. Trying to think if I should throw a dig in about finishing outside the medals at national championships last month.No but we've got council flats in Strelley
It wasn'tFor what its worth ,I thought the ball was out. I do tire of "playing the victims" sometimes. Had we been 3-0 up it wouldn't have mattered
Despite what the Man U commentators say, No way was it out. They should have gone to Specsavers.For what its worth ,I thought the ball was out. I do tire of "playing the victims" sometimes. Had we been 3-0 up it wouldn't have mattered
Apart from the sarcasm, a terrific replyIt wasn't
We aren't
We weren't and it did.
Apart from that, a terrific post!![]()
He's right though. It was a foul in both instances and the foul should have been significant enough for the goals to be disallowed.Guardiola kicking off about Boremouth's blatant cheating at corners. And there wasn't even an obvious push, and they went on to win. He'd have had an aneurism if he was in Dyche's shoes.
It’s borderline cheating though VP.There was a discussion on "Ref Watch" on SSN a week or two ago and the consensus appeared to be that, though we all deplore the silly niggles and petty pushes etc, if you were the manager, you'd tell your players to do it. To disrupt the play at free kicks, to allow your players to fall back into defensive positions; that sort of thing.