vertigored
Geoff Thomas
Doesn’t really say anything new, just more feeding into the narrative that the Anderson transfer has massively inflated the market.. ignoring Chelsea, Liverpool etc
Before he joined (and within the first few weeks) I thought he always came across as a salt of the earth type who the common fan could relate to.He's always been like this.
People wanted him to work out because of his Forest connections and the two Steve's of course, but.... we got exactly what I expected in terms of his management and personality.
Let me guess before I watch it...Leave this one here:
Plenty to unpack.
My takeaway: VP was seen to have better football, but that’s mainly because we were winning game (suggesting it wasn’t actually better than Dycheball).
I don’t think Forest fans are fussy on style of play which is what he is implying.Doesn’t really say anything new, just more feeding into the narrative that the Anderson transfer has massively inflated the market.. ignoring Chelsea, Liverpool etc
He's a complete charlatan, a very wealthy guy who has spent a long time making money in the top league but masquerading as "one of the lads" by talking about how much he loves a curry and a beer, and other down-to-Earth stuff he knows people will lap up.Before he joined (and within the first few weeks) I thought he always came across as a salt of the earth type who the common fan could relate to.
However before long it seems more and more the case that he's actually a bluffer and also comes across highly arrogant. In the end I couldn't stand listening to his 'skinny jeans flared jeans' bullshit mixed in with the odd Clough anecdote for PR purposes.
Unless it's pure desperation the man is finished at the top level.
Spinning a club maximising value on a sale as "inflating the market" is so weird.Doesn’t really say anything new, just more feeding into the narrative that the Anderson transfer has massively inflated the market.. ignoring Chelsea, Liverpool etc
I agree with the Everton fans part, a bit like we were told about Vlach but didn't listen, but worse than imPostecoglu, McLeish, Pratt and Hughton is taking it too far.Again, the Everton fans told us all this. Amazing how our blind hope that it would be any different ignored them.
2nd only to Megson in my personal opinion, and all very predictable
I'll admit to having my doubts but then being won over by his first press conference, like all the other mugs! I think we were all just so desperate to try and rescue what should've been one of our most enjoyable seasons ever.Again, the Everton fans told us all this. Amazing how our blind hope that it would be any different ignored them.
2nd only to Megson in my personal opinion, and all very predictable
I did say personal. I've always disliked Dyche, seeing him standing on the touchline with half his finger up his trumpet whilst we bimbed crosses into nobody absolutely boiled my pissI agree with the Everton fans part, a bit like we were told about Vlach but didn't listen, but worse than imPostecoglu, McLeish, Pratt and Hughton is taking it too far.
Got to blaming fans as per, arrogant thin skinned tosser.Leave this one here:
Plenty to unpack.
My takeaway: VP was seen to have better football, but that’s mainly because we were winning game (suggesting it wasn’t actually better than Dycheball).
I think he was ultimately the manager who kept us up. Despite the impact being a lot more short term than most people imagined (a lot on here were saying they'd be happy to have Dyche for the season but not after) and tactically he'd probably lost it a few weeks before he did - those Everton games did not do him any favours at all - as well as the players not being in (which is as good a reason as any to get rid) he did turn around the club after the Ange time and try and get back some organisation... but it was probably right to get rid when we did. Vitor was still at Wolves when we got rid of Ange and probably we wouldn't have got him then so it would probably have been someone else like Benitez or Mancini at the time - might that have ended differently? We won't know but he did play a part in the season not being a total disaster, so probably nowhere near Megson.Again, the Everton fans told us all this. Amazing how our blind hope that it would be any different ignored them.
2nd only to Megson in my personal opinion, and all very predictable
What if he was opening his mouth to take your nuts?f*** the ginger ****. I’d rather drag my nuts through broken glass than hear him open his mouth again.
Which is ironically what his voice sounds like.f*** the ginger ****. I’d rather drag my nuts through broken glass than hear him open his mouth again.
VP kept us up though. Results were trending downwardsI think he was ultimately the manager who kept us up. Despite the impact being a lot more short term than most people imagined (a lot on here were saying they'd be happy to have Dyche for the season but not after) and tactically he'd probably lost it a few weeks before he did - those Everton games did not do him any favours at all - as well as the players not being in (which is as good a reason as any to get rid) he did turn around the club after the Ange time and try and get back some organisation... but it was probably right to get rid when we did. Vitor was still at Wolves when we got rid of Ange and probably we wouldn't have got him then so it would probably have been someone else like Benitez or Mancini at the time - might that have ended differently? We won't know but he did play a part in the season not being a total disaster, so probably nowhere near Megson.
It's unanswerable. Personally I think he would have but it wouldn't have been as comfortable as under VP and that also we wouldn't have gone as far in the EL to save the league campaign, probably we would have stayed up by the last day or maybe just before. I think it's also fair to point out that under VP the early league performances (Brighton, Liverpool etc) were as unconvincing as the ones under Dyche, and that he managed to get the first result v Spurs, and then the ones after were because Burnley were bad, and also because Chelsea were in a mess, and that outside of that (apart from the Sunderland match) performances weren't that good either.VP kept us up though. Results were trending downwards
with him at the helm and he'd obviously lost the dressing room, would he have kept us up if he had stayed until the end of season? Tough to say.
My tea bags might actually clear his throatWhat if he was opening his mouth to take your nuts?
At the time I thought yes (although still supported the sacking). But in hindsight I think the pressure brought on from West Ham, Leeds and Spurs all having very good form for teams battling the drop would've seen us crumble.VP kept us up though. Results were trending downwards
with him at the helm and he'd obviously lost the dressing room, would he have kept us up if he had stayed until the end of season? Tough to say.
It's difficult to say. We did beat West Ham and Spurs as well as Wolves once, but then we also drew with Wolves and lost to Leeds in the reverse fixtures.From the point at which Dyche left the club it's the three wins in a row at Burnley, Sunderland and Chelsea that kept us up
And personally given how we performed away at the likes of Everton I can't say with any certainty that we'd have won even one of those games under SD, let alone all three
If a forthright an individual as EM who is ultimately your boss asked your opinion on Dyche I struggle to see what the players could have said. He'd engendered zero loyalty for the players to go into bat for him and got what he deserved.We can only guess, but the trajectory was suggesting relegation. More tellingly, his chit-chat since indicates he wasn't for changing anything and it was all the media/the fans/MGW's fault. Trajectory wasn't gonna change with that outlook.