Jonathan said:
bicknell said:I am not a big fan of released players
The spelling and grammar are good.Jonathan said:This thread's only saving grace is that the spelling and grammar is good. Thankfully.
jerellis1 said:The spelling and grammar are good.
But they're not a single thing... they're two different things. And you can't just say you're describing them as a single thing unless you're inventing your very own new set of rules for English grammar. Sorry to be such a pedant but, to be fair, I am an English teacher and not only do I know my way around a plural, but I also owe it to the world to save the unwitting from making grammatical boo-boos.Jonathan said:And when I'm talking about spelling and grammar as a single thing, it's is. Thanks.
Jonathan said:And when I'm talking about spelling and grammar as a single thing, it's is. Thanks.

The same Murty that struggled to get into the Charlton side? No thanks.mouldy said:Hanheman would suit the goalkeeping slot perfectly. Not the greatest keeper in the league but most definately up there and far beyond anything Camp or Smith could offer us. Lita is a good player that should be playing regularly I wouldn't mind signing him.
Is Murty a right back? If yes then he is good too.
mouldy said:Hanheman would suit the goalkeeping slot perfectly. Not the greatest keeper in the league but most definately up there and far beyond anything Camp or Smith could offer us.
Tutts said:I take it you haven't seen him play much the last couple of seasons?
Most Reading fans I know want shot of him due to all his errors.
I'd have gone for a semi-colon after good, rather than a full stop.Jonathan said:This thread's only saving grace is that the spelling and grammar is good. Thankfully.
No no no! Parenthesising "thankfully" would surely be the most appropriate course of action.Anatoli said:I'd have gone for a semi-colon after good, rather than a full stop.
NFFC1989 said:Hanheman would and wouldnt be a good signing, I mean he's a cracking keeper and certainly is bgetter than hwhat we have but he wears short sleeve shirts and keepers just dont look right in them.plus i wouldnt want a short sleeved keepers shirt....
I think muurty would also be a good signing.
Johno22 said:Not that I'm counting but this is the 54th time you've mentioned Hanheman is a waste of space.