Capital Girl
Youth Team
Apologies in advance if you think this post is a little negative - as I've said before, 10 crap seasons in the last 11 and only one win against the sheep since I was old enough to have wine before the match tends to make me not get carried away when things might start looking up... ;D
Anyhow, whilst we've undoubtedly strengthened the squad, and everyone is justifiably looking towards the top half rather than the bottom half for this season, it appears to me that whenever we've been seriously challenged for a player, we've come off second best.
I don't know any other clubs that were definitely linked with / interested in Camp, Blackstock, McGoldrick, McKenna and Gunter; Anderson's sterling efforts with us last year meant he was always going to come here, and Adebola being offered a two-year contract at the age of 73 was a surefire winner.
BUT, in the area we needed to make the key signings IMO (whilst Adebola, Blackstock and McGoldrick have given us options, I wouldn't say they definitely better than Earnshaw, Tyson and Garner) - ie centre back and left back - we've been gazumped by Derby for Barker, Reading for Mills and Celtic for Fox.
Why? I'm hoping one of our more informed members can enlighten me. Did they meet Billy and decide he was that dislikeable? Or did the transfer committee not even let Billy get close to his men?
We're playing the sheep in just 3 and a half weeks, and the thought of Commons and Hulse taking our centre-backs to the cleaners again makes me feel sick.
PS - I'm a girl, I may be wrong.
Anyhow, whilst we've undoubtedly strengthened the squad, and everyone is justifiably looking towards the top half rather than the bottom half for this season, it appears to me that whenever we've been seriously challenged for a player, we've come off second best.
I don't know any other clubs that were definitely linked with / interested in Camp, Blackstock, McGoldrick, McKenna and Gunter; Anderson's sterling efforts with us last year meant he was always going to come here, and Adebola being offered a two-year contract at the age of 73 was a surefire winner.
BUT, in the area we needed to make the key signings IMO (whilst Adebola, Blackstock and McGoldrick have given us options, I wouldn't say they definitely better than Earnshaw, Tyson and Garner) - ie centre back and left back - we've been gazumped by Derby for Barker, Reading for Mills and Celtic for Fox.
Why? I'm hoping one of our more informed members can enlighten me. Did they meet Billy and decide he was that dislikeable? Or did the transfer committee not even let Billy get close to his men?
We're playing the sheep in just 3 and a half weeks, and the thought of Commons and Hulse taking our centre-backs to the cleaners again makes me feel sick.
PS - I'm a girl, I may be wrong.
