Gonzalo Ariel Montiel

[Retro]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[Bob Fossil]

View attachment 42054

I thought he was available relatively cheap? Not sure at that money.

 

[Retro]

You just know it will be this year where he get's done for the stuff in Argentina.

 

[Any Time Now]

Would rather gamble on someone who might be shit or might be good as opposed to €9m on someone that we already know is shit

 

[YouReds43]

How about No.

 

[Deleted member 4346]

If we are paying 12m euros then we have lost our f***ing minds.

And I say that as someone who thinks he’s actually OK.

But we didn’t sign him three months ago. Why sign him now?

Reeks of panic.

 

[Samba's Water Bottle]

God please no. On the pitch he's bad enough, but we shouldn't be going anywhere near him again with the off pitch accusations.

 

[Deleted User 27810]

FFS!

 

[Larry Lansbury]

He had some good games, then some poorer games. Just difficult to pinpoint what his strengths are so far -as both defensively and attacking he has not excelled. Doesn’t appear to have any outstanding strengths-unless I’m missing something.

 

[YouReds43]

This can't be true whatsoever surely, No one from the Forest side have reported anything let alone interest

 

[eyupmeduck]

If we are paying 12m euros then we have lost our f***ing minds.

And I say that as someone who thinks he’s actually OK.

But we didn’t sign him three months ago. Why sign him now?

Reeks of panic.

I'd question if we were paying 12 million Floki or whatever that dodgy crypto sponsor is (That would be £1062 in cash btw) simply because he didn't do a hugely great job (Wasn't awful either) and we didnt sign him when we had a £8.5m option so signing him for more than we could have doesn't ring true.





Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[MaxiRobriguez]

Wonder if we've got a different target were struggling to get over the line and we're using Montiel as leverage given it wouldn't surprise the football world if we were in for him.

If we really wanted Montiel we would have finalised it weeks ago.

 

[Deleted User 27810]

What was the value of the option we had on him?

 

[YouReds43]

What was the value of the option we had on him?

£9.5m - Supposedly we have offered £7.7m + 2.5m which works out more. I really don't see it.

 

[marshal99]

Just when we have clear most of our bombsquad , new members show up to add to the collection.

 

[YouReds43]

Why has no one like Percy, The Athletic or Fabrizio tweeted about it. We didn't want him back at the end of the season, why do we want him now?
I really hope this isn't true - There is way better RBs out there.

 

[Deleted User 27810]

£9.5m - Supposedly we have offered £7.7m + 2.5m which works out more. I really don't see it.

Thanks, yeah I agree that makes zero sense

 

[Neurotica]

I’d rather get DJed Spence back!

 

[Ashley]

He's f'cking wank. None of the usual reliable sources have reported anything on this, so hopefully it's just agent talk.

 

[Bob Fossil]

This can't be true whatsoever surely, No one from the Forest side have reported anything let alone interest

The source is a bit iffy to be fair.

Just a Seville fan site.

 

[Quntib Hollox]

There’s a reason we didn’t pay the buy out fee at the end of last season.
He goes missing a bit too often to justify that outlay even as a back up option.

 

[YouReds43]

The source is a bit iffy to be fair.

Just a Seville fan site.

Yes Lets hope so. The CLMERLO seems to be the best Argentinian Reporter and he hasn't said anything.

 

[Shearstone]

There’s a reason we didn’t pay the buy out fee at the end of last season.
He goes missing a bit too often to justify that outlay even as a back up option.

Not just goes missing as in is anonymous. He would literally go for a wander in multiple games and cost us goals.

 

[Monkman]

No me gusta.

 

[Master Yates]

Surely this can’t be true. He was crap last year and at that price there are surely thousands of better options.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk