Gonzalo Ariel Montiel

Gyros Peter

Sauce salad?
I wasn't clear in my post: I know the trigger was the £9.4m, not £20m.
My point was that talk of a £6m "discount2 was totally false, as the player was never going to command a £9.4m fee because he isn't worth anything like that.
I used £20m purely to point out that both £9.4m and £20m were equally ridiculous numbers, and for what it was worth £20m could have been included in the loan contract and the papers would be talking about a £16m discount.
What the headline should have said: "Forest avoid overpaying £6m for over-rated talentless full back".
Ah, got you. I'd take a 16m discount - means they owe us 7 million for taking him.
 

Captain Sinister

Senior doom Monger
And with the case while it's a terrible look, I think it's very important to remember not everyone accused of something has done it.
Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.
I am not saying the young lady in this instance did that, nor am i saying that Montiel did anything... just pointing out that the prospect of big money can make people do nasty things.
Did Trump pay Stormy Daniels hush money, and then commit "false accounting" to hide the payment, or did Stormy Daniels and Michael cohen see a sure-fire way of besmirching the impeccable Trump?
 

MASE

Up-Front
Here's one - if you were the club and wanted two full backs covering four spots (an assumption on my part), if you could buy Montiel for less than or equal to what you'd get for Toffolo which would you take?

Different sides though Aina offsets that, and while the correct answer is probably neither, of the two I'd have Montiel.

Keep Toffolo, his Chelsea errors still raw but generally he's been good, plus he's a thoroughly decent pro.

Montiels Chelsea error sort of epitomised him for me, he's a loose canon defensively.
 

Gyros Peter

Sauce salad?
Keep Toffolo, his Chelsea errors still raw but generally he's been good, plus he's a thoroughly decent pro.

Montiels Chelsea error sort of epitomised him for me, he's a loose canon defensively.
He's certainly shown that of late - I feel similar about Toffs though, in that he isn't really up to it defensively rather than loose cannon.

I wonder with Montiel whether that could be ironed out, though it's probably not worth the effort finding out.
 

Haych

John Robertson
Let the authorities decide if he’s been up to no good off the pitch.

He’s not been much cop on the pitch so I’d let him return to his parent club, he had a few bright sparks but doesn’t look like he’s a fit for us.
 

Gyros Peter

Sauce salad?
Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.
I am not saying the young lady in this instance did that, nor am i saying that Montiel did anything... just pointing out that the prospect of big money can make people do nasty things.
Did Trump pay Stormy Daniels hush money, and then commit "false accounting" to hide the payment, or did Stormy Daniels and Michael cohen see a sure-fire way of besmirching the impeccable Trump?
There's definitely the other side to it too, in that there's a huge list of victims unable to get their case past the CPS to ever face trial.

To be clear, my own stance is that rape is a terrible crime and I am not looking to take any side here.
 

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
There's definitely the other side to it too, in that there's a huge list of victims unable to get their case past the CPS to ever face trial.

To be clear, my own stance is that rape is a terrible crime and I am not looking to take any side here.
Usually that is due to lack of evidence meeting the threshold to build a criminal case. Guilt in the courts doesn't just mean someone said it, there probably needs to be stuff like forensics or witnesses etc. And even when it does get to trial it needs to stand up in front of cross-examining with the various barristers and a jury.

This is why he is - like anyone else - innocent until proven guilty and personally I find it wrong that the media decides to name these people before they have been convicted. It should be embargoed.
 

Notcher

Steve Chettle
I agree completely with this. You are guilty whether you are accused, charged or found not guilty as soon as it's in the public domain. It's wrong.
I know a guy that was on Oldham's books and he was even being looked at by the Republic of Ireland but ended up being sacked because of something like this.

He had started seeing a girl and she turned out to be 14 (she definitely didn't' look it). She had fabricated social media accounts with a false age to back up what she had said. Then when it didn't work out she then went to the police. He was still arrested and charged with a string of child sex offences and had to go through the ordeal of a crown court trial. It was only at the trial it was found that she had lied and fabricated everything about her age. Obviously he was found not guilty and cleared of all charges.

He was on the verge of suicide and his career was in pieces, which was made considerably worse because it was all put out by the national media well in advance of his trial before he could prove his innocence.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
I know a guy that was on Oldham's books and he was even being looked at by the Republic of Ireland but ended up being sacked because of something like this.

He had started seeing a girl and she turned out to be 14 (she definitely didn't' look it). She had fabricated social media accounts with a false age to back up what she had said. Then when it didn't work out she then went to the police. He was still arrested and charged with a string of child sex offences and had to go through the ordeal of a crown court trial. It was only at the trial it was found that she had lied and fabricated everything about her age. Obviously he was found not guilty and cleared of all charges.

He was on the verge of suicide and his career was in pieces, which was made considerably worse because it was all put out by the national media well in advance of his trial before he could prove his innocence.

I think we should steer clear of conferring anecdotal evidence with Montiels case given the thousands upon thousands of women who can't get the justice they deserve because the courts (rightly) demand a level of evidence they can't (thorough no fault of their own) provide.

I don't know if Montiel is innocent or guilty and I wish people would just let the legal process get on with it rather than touch upon things which are frankly irrelevant.

I would also call out the there's a lot more women and girls at Forest now thank ever before so when we're discussing such a sensitive topic that is impacting the club we should remember not all fans are adult men and therefore would consider our choice of words carefully.
 
Last edited:

Notcher

Steve Chettle
I think we should steer clear of anecdotal evidence given the thousands upon thousands of women who can't get the justice they deserve because the courts (rightly) demand a level of evidence they can't provide.

I don't know if Montiel is innocent or guilty and I wish people would just be quiet about it until it concludes.
I agree. Having seen what it did to that lad it really opened my eyes. The same goes for the women as you say that can't get a conviction because they either aren't believed or because the threshold is so high.

Either way there really should be something in place to embargo such things until a conviction is achieved.
 

Harry1982

Jack Armstrong
And with the case while it's a terrible look, I think it's very important to remember not everyone accused of something has done it.
Maybe not, the victim has chosen to go to trial rather then get a payout/ payoff or reach a deal. I know that's not proven guilt but i do think that very sketchy at the least, whatever happened the club should probably distance themselves from him.
 

Master Yates

Stuart Pearce
Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.
I am not saying the young lady in this instance did that, nor am i saying that Montiel did anything... just pointing out that the prospect of big money can make people do nasty things.
Did Trump pay Stormy Daniels hush money, and then commit "false accounting" to hide the payment, or did Stormy Daniels and Michael cohen see a sure-fire way of besmirching the impeccable Trump?

What a load of horseshit. If you’re not saying she’s lying, then what on earth has that drivel in your first paragraph got to do with anything and what has the fact she is young or attractive got to do with anything?

You’ll be talking about what she was wearing next. “Impossible to defend against”? How about “statistically almost impossible to prove” as that’s more accurate.

Maybe when all the boomer rape apologists die off, the pitiful rape conviction rates in this country might increase.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Captain Sinister

Senior doom Monger
What a load of horseshit. If you’re not saying she’s lying, then what on earth has that drivel in your first paragraph got to do with anything and what has the fact she is young or attractive got to do with anything?

You’ll be talking about what she was wearing next. “Impossible to defend against”? How about “statistically almost impossible to prove” as that’s more accurate.

Maybe when all the boomer rape apologists die off, the pitiful rape conviction rates in this country might increase.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you take care to read my post again I am merely pointing out that where there is money there may be a temptation to try and access it with a damaging accusation that may or may not be true.
The alleged incident has not been proven one way or another.
It didn’t take place in this country.
My post was not referencing the case specifically.
As for your accusation I am stating “she is lying”, well I didn’t say that.
And I totally agree with your view that proving rape, and securing a conviction is statistically nigh on impossible.
There are numerous factors that combine to make it so, a major one being male attitudes towards women, including a testosterone-fuelled, male dominated police force.
As for suggesting I would argue “what a woman was wearing meant she was asking for it” , well as you know nothing about me I will treat that statement with the contempt it deserves.
 

DizzyBala

Jack Burkitt
I felt uncomfortable about him joining when he did, given it was hanging over him. I still feel uncomfortable about him being associated with the club. I wouldn't want us to sign him, whether he's innocent or guilty because he's nothing special but the fact that he's caught up in something, it's a bad look for the club. Same thing with Tavares being weird with that dog.
 

Otis Redding

Try A Little Tenderness
What a load of horseshit. If you’re not saying she’s lying, then what on earth has that drivel in your first paragraph got to do with anything and what has the fact she is young or attractive got to do with anything?

You’ll be talking about what she was wearing next. “Impossible to defend against”? How about “statistically almost impossible to prove” as that’s more accurate.

Maybe when all the boomer rape apologists die off, the pitiful rape conviction rates in this country might increase.
As a "boomer" myself, can I say that not all of us are the type of apologists you describe, or are ready to die just yet. As a father, grandfather and great-grandfather of girls I share your concerns about the shameful conviction figures.
 
On the pitch, I can’t work him out. Sometimes he looks really good; sometimes he looks like a pub player.

All in all I certainly wouldn’t be keeping him.
 
D

Deleted member 4346

Guest
Loan ended and we haven't picked up the option to buy.

Time to move to ex players.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
Sensible.
 
Top Bottom