Gyros Peter
Sauce salad?
And with the case while it's a terrible look, I think it's very important to remember not everyone accused of something has done it.
Ah, got you. I'd take a 16m discount - means they owe us 7 million for taking him.I wasn't clear in my post: I know the trigger was the £9.4m, not £20m.
My point was that talk of a £6m "discount2 was totally false, as the player was never going to command a £9.4m fee because he isn't worth anything like that.
I used £20m purely to point out that both £9.4m and £20m were equally ridiculous numbers, and for what it was worth £20m could have been included in the loan contract and the papers would be talking about a £16m discount.
What the headline should have said: "Forest avoid overpaying £6m for over-rated talentless full back".
Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.And with the case while it's a terrible look, I think it's very important to remember not everyone accused of something has done it.
Here's one - if you were the club and wanted two full backs covering four spots (an assumption on my part), if you could buy Montiel for less than or equal to what you'd get for Toffolo which would you take?
Different sides though Aina offsets that, and while the correct answer is probably neither, of the two I'd have Montiel.
He's certainly shown that of late - I feel similar about Toffs though, in that he isn't really up to it defensively rather than loose cannon.Keep Toffolo, his Chelsea errors still raw but generally he's been good, plus he's a thoroughly decent pro.
Montiels Chelsea error sort of epitomised him for me, he's a loose canon defensively.
There's definitely the other side to it too, in that there's a huge list of victims unable to get their case past the CPS to ever face trial.Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.
I am not saying the young lady in this instance did that, nor am i saying that Montiel did anything... just pointing out that the prospect of big money can make people do nasty things.
Did Trump pay Stormy Daniels hush money, and then commit "false accounting" to hide the payment, or did Stormy Daniels and Michael cohen see a sure-fire way of besmirching the impeccable Trump?
Treading carefully, there are enough right backs in the world for us to not sign one that has largely been unimpressive on loan for us AND has this still hanging over his head.*moderator hat on*
Please tread carefully
*Moderator hat off*
Usually that is due to lack of evidence meeting the threshold to build a criminal case. Guilt in the courts doesn't just mean someone said it, there probably needs to be stuff like forensics or witnesses etc. And even when it does get to trial it needs to stand up in front of cross-examining with the various barristers and a jury.There's definitely the other side to it too, in that there's a huge list of victims unable to get their case past the CPS to ever face trial.
To be clear, my own stance is that rape is a terrible crime and I am not looking to take any side here.
I agree completely with this. You are guilty whether you are accused, charged or found not guilty as soon as it's in the public domain. It's wrong.I find it wrong that the media decides to name these people before they have been convicted. It should be embargoed.
I know a guy that was on Oldham's books and he was even being looked at by the Republic of Ireland but ended up being sacked because of something like this.I agree completely with this. You are guilty whether you are accused, charged or found not guilty as soon as it's in the public domain. It's wrong.
I know a guy that was on Oldham's books and he was even being looked at by the Republic of Ireland but ended up being sacked because of something like this.
He had started seeing a girl and she turned out to be 14 (she definitely didn't' look it). She had fabricated social media accounts with a false age to back up what she had said. Then when it didn't work out she then went to the police. He was still arrested and charged with a string of child sex offences and had to go through the ordeal of a crown court trial. It was only at the trial it was found that she had lied and fabricated everything about her age. Obviously he was found not guilty and cleared of all charges.
He was on the verge of suicide and his career was in pieces, which was made considerably worse because it was all put out by the national media well in advance of his trial before he could prove his innocence.
I agree. Having seen what it did to that lad it really opened my eyes. The same goes for the women as you say that can't get a conviction because they either aren't believed or because the threshold is so high.I think we should steer clear of anecdotal evidence given the thousands upon thousands of women who can't get the justice they deserve because the courts (rightly) demand a level of evidence they can't provide.
I don't know if Montiel is innocent or guilty and I wish people would just be quiet about it until it concludes.
Maybe not, the victim has chosen to go to trial rather then get a payout/ payoff or reach a deal. I know that's not proven guilt but i do think that very sketchy at the least, whatever happened the club should probably distance themselves from him.And with the case while it's a terrible look, I think it's very important to remember not everyone accused of something has done it.
Especially since we already have another two excellent ones if we exercise the option on Ola Aina.Treading carefully, there are enough right backs in the world for us to not sign one that has largely been unimpressive on loan for us AND has this still hanging over his head.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Quelle surpise that an attractive young lady might be tempted to take rich sports star/pop star/politician etc etc for as much as she can by accusing them of something that is almost impossible to defend against, so they pay hush money.
I am not saying the young lady in this instance did that, nor am i saying that Montiel did anything... just pointing out that the prospect of big money can make people do nasty things.
Did Trump pay Stormy Daniels hush money, and then commit "false accounting" to hide the payment, or did Stormy Daniels and Michael cohen see a sure-fire way of besmirching the impeccable Trump?
If you take care to read my post again I am merely pointing out that where there is money there may be a temptation to try and access it with a damaging accusation that may or may not be true.What a load of horseshit. If you’re not saying she’s lying, then what on earth has that drivel in your first paragraph got to do with anything and what has the fact she is young or attractive got to do with anything?
You’ll be talking about what she was wearing next. “Impossible to defend against”? How about “statistically almost impossible to prove” as that’s more accurate.
Maybe when all the boomer rape apologists die off, the pitiful rape conviction rates in this country might increase.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As a "boomer" myself, can I say that not all of us are the type of apologists you describe, or are ready to die just yet. As a father, grandfather and great-grandfather of girls I share your concerns about the shameful conviction figures.What a load of horseshit. If you’re not saying she’s lying, then what on earth has that drivel in your first paragraph got to do with anything and what has the fact she is young or attractive got to do with anything?
You’ll be talking about what she was wearing next. “Impossible to defend against”? How about “statistically almost impossible to prove” as that’s more accurate.
Maybe when all the boomer rape apologists die off, the pitiful rape conviction rates in this country might increase.
And yet Harry Maguire continues to make a living playing in it.