goatboy
Grenville Morris
I do hope the club are reading this.
When I grew up I lived in Lincolnshire, far side of Lincoln from Nottingham, but I could still get Radio Nottm commentary of Forest games. Living in Manchester even the right wind wouldn't get me a signal, but then I could get the commentary streamed on the internet, through the Forest site or the BBC site. Then, of course, Player came on board and 'monetised' it. Four quid or so a month for the commentary and a bunch of other stuff I'm really not able to pretend I give two shits about. I just want to follow my club for the matches I don't get to see.
At the time, this was called unfair by many, I didn't disagree as my stance is this - we pay our licence fees, these go on local area news, sport, etc. Once the 'rights' of this or that start getting brought into it everything goes to shit, I'm stuck with Hull commentaries these days and nothing else. What do I care about Hull? They're not my team. Forest wanting to make money is one thing but presently I'm too skint to keep up my player subs, so I have the twenty second's coverage from the Football League Show to go on to keep me interested.
If 'Matchday on Radio Nottingham' (yes, it's not as if Forest can be arsed to produce their own coverage either) was something that left me feeling happy and rewarded then it'd be another story but in seasons like this, charging to listen to something you'd think they'd be grateful anyone would want to listen to is a bit rich. Especially over such a tiny amount of money (to a club).
When I'm shortly back earning, I'll be able to afford Player subs many times over, but I might just not bother. I'm happy to give up my sunny (or not so) Saturday afternoons, my weeknight freedom too sometimes, to sit by my computer listening to Colin Fray tell me how shit my team is. And in turn the club I put money into when I can is never far from my thoughts. But having had a few weeks without it, I can't say I'm any less happy, nor that the news I get makes me feel as if I'm missing anything. And game by game I'm finding myself less arsed about the next one because I know less about it, our form, etc. Are Forest cutting off their nose to spite their face here?
I think the point I'm making is that it's quite shit supporting most clubs most of the time and the margins from 'Player' can't be so huge that the long term gain is greater than having an open door to the supporting diaspora, keeping them part of the flock. Even if we weren't paying for audio coverage, it still wouldn't be free, as you have to f*** off your barbecue, day in the park, evening down the pub etc and just sit there.
On the other hand, I'd pay a fair amount to WATCH all our games live on the internet. All those cameras at every game, just for the tiny bit at half midnight on a Saturday? What a waste.
When I grew up I lived in Lincolnshire, far side of Lincoln from Nottingham, but I could still get Radio Nottm commentary of Forest games. Living in Manchester even the right wind wouldn't get me a signal, but then I could get the commentary streamed on the internet, through the Forest site or the BBC site. Then, of course, Player came on board and 'monetised' it. Four quid or so a month for the commentary and a bunch of other stuff I'm really not able to pretend I give two shits about. I just want to follow my club for the matches I don't get to see.
At the time, this was called unfair by many, I didn't disagree as my stance is this - we pay our licence fees, these go on local area news, sport, etc. Once the 'rights' of this or that start getting brought into it everything goes to shit, I'm stuck with Hull commentaries these days and nothing else. What do I care about Hull? They're not my team. Forest wanting to make money is one thing but presently I'm too skint to keep up my player subs, so I have the twenty second's coverage from the Football League Show to go on to keep me interested.
If 'Matchday on Radio Nottingham' (yes, it's not as if Forest can be arsed to produce their own coverage either) was something that left me feeling happy and rewarded then it'd be another story but in seasons like this, charging to listen to something you'd think they'd be grateful anyone would want to listen to is a bit rich. Especially over such a tiny amount of money (to a club).
When I'm shortly back earning, I'll be able to afford Player subs many times over, but I might just not bother. I'm happy to give up my sunny (or not so) Saturday afternoons, my weeknight freedom too sometimes, to sit by my computer listening to Colin Fray tell me how shit my team is. And in turn the club I put money into when I can is never far from my thoughts. But having had a few weeks without it, I can't say I'm any less happy, nor that the news I get makes me feel as if I'm missing anything. And game by game I'm finding myself less arsed about the next one because I know less about it, our form, etc. Are Forest cutting off their nose to spite their face here?
I think the point I'm making is that it's quite shit supporting most clubs most of the time and the margins from 'Player' can't be so huge that the long term gain is greater than having an open door to the supporting diaspora, keeping them part of the flock. Even if we weren't paying for audio coverage, it still wouldn't be free, as you have to f*** off your barbecue, day in the park, evening down the pub etc and just sit there.
On the other hand, I'd pay a fair amount to WATCH all our games live on the internet. All those cameras at every game, just for the tiny bit at half midnight on a Saturday? What a waste.