Ian Moore Gone Little
Geoff Thomas
I haven’t seen the survey in the programme myself yet but there’s no time limit as far as I’m concerned for anything anyone wants to raise via me.I have some constructive suggestions although I am so full-on with work it's unlikely to be this week before I can send anything.
For now, over the last season there was an improvement. However .....
it's still not worth the money
the seemingly apparent absence of proof reading is embarrassing
the programme does not represent Forest at all well, but it can do and it will do.
More asap.
I entirely agree about the proofreading. It was very annoying when I spent hours collating all the European stats for the Villa semi-final programme only for the designers to make a right mess of the table with the overall stats and then nobody at the club proofread it so the mangled version was published. And that was after I had written that any possible errors in the stats were mine! And almost every issue there’s something that hasn’t been corrected - a chunk of text repeated, a sentence ending mid-sentence, a bit of text left in from the previous issue, etc. The worst example was when the cover of the Wolves programme spelled Wanderers wrong.
As I said to the editor yesterday, this is an official mouthpiece of a club at the highest level of the game and we shouldn’t be getting this stuff wrong. He knows this and he is also frustrated at the errors the designers have made (though as editor it should be him spotting them not me!) so I hope he can be assertive and get them to do a better, more professional job next season.
Anyway, thanks as ever for your interest in this and I hope you get the chance to have your say, either directly or through me.
Last edited: