He was captain was he not? Not a very cover-like role.smithy said:Would be a terrible signing! If he was half decent wouldnt stoke have signed him for an extra for cover
Anatoli said:Too old.
Would prefer Sheringham or Collymore.
Marshdweller said:Seriously, we should stop looking at 34+ year-old players, and invest in some more players like Cohen and Wilson - potential and not too expensive! Once a player is past 32ish, they are only going to get worse, and more importantly, slower. We need players who can improve with the club, not pass us going in the opposite direction.
But unfair to label Lockwood in that vain as well seeing as we very rarely saw him on the pitch but I see what your getting at and no a hole in Calderwood's head would be a better signing than Domonic MatteoLOOMIS said:First rule in football:
NEVER, EVER pay money for a 30-year-old-plus player unless he is out of the top drawer, and then give him a ONE YEAR contract only.
How many over 30's players have we signed who have been complete shite in the past 5 years?
The list is too numerous to go into detail, but I'll start with Eaden, Holt, Lockwood etc.
LOOMIS said:First rule in football:
NEVER, EVER pay money for a 30-year-old-plus player unless he is out of the top drawer, and then give him a ONE YEAR contract only.
How many over 30's players have we signed who have been complete s**te in the past 5 years?
The list is too numerous to go into detail, but I'll start with Eaden, Holt, Lockwood etc.
He'll end up manager of somewhere like West Brom
Has just been released by Stoke.
I think he could do a good job for us.