Search results

  1. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    If you believe that statement will do more harm then good, then clearly you think it's corrupt as it will influence decisions. If it wasn't corrupt or bias the statement should have no impact?
  2. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    Yep mid 90s and United couldn't compete with galatasary.
  3. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    I work in cyber security, hackers are routinely employed. A dodgy ref is ideal to show you how dodgy refs are.
  4. H

    Nuno Herlander Simões Espírito Santo

    Said it myself and regularly use villa as a example. Some teams yoyo before finding their feet, villa with greanlish, martinez in goal etc spent 2 seasons around the relegation zone.
  5. H

    Ryan James Yates (sponsored by Raymondo Ponté)

    Maybe we should bring back the ginger pirlo?
  6. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    That coventry decision, makes it look like they wanted man U in the final. Probably thought cov would not be a big enough draw for the final.
  7. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    That was the most asinine offside I have ever seen. They literally had to draw 2 lines in different colours to make it look offside.
  8. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    We have not actually said corruption, could always argue subconscious bias.
  9. H

    Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

    I think it could have been done classier, it still needed to be said though. I would have preferred someone to go through clips for penalty that these 2 refs or VAR officials have been given and question how identical incidents the same person can deem one a penalty and not the other.
  10. H

    Opposition fans' comments: Everton v Forest

    Atleast most acknowledge we should have won the match, how MGW didn't get that on target. VAR is a failed experiment, if they can't get consistency after watching video replays, some draw offside lines from a outstretched arm, shoulder and others draw what can only be described as lines from...
  11. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    Exactly you can accept a ref making a error in split second but you can't accept refs watching it in VAR room on a video replay and not giving it, or not being consistent on what is considered handball, a penalty offence etc.
  12. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    True, other then the 2 long range shots everton didn't produce much else. If we had drawn level, I could picture their heads dropping
  13. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    So the ref didn't give the CHO pen because he thought young got the ball first but clearly he did not. At that point the game potentially 1 all, and we have all to play for
  14. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    But apparently anything around the box and your arms need to be next to your body, sometimes they give them sometimes they don't. I can get no consistency when it's a ref making a split second decision on the pitch but how can you not have consistency when some mongo watching it on a video replay.
  15. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    Niakhate is looking like what the defence has been missing
  16. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    All forest at the moment, need to make it count
  17. H

    Matchday 34 - Everton v Nottingham Forest - „El Fiasco!“ - Sunday, 21st April KO 1:30pm

    To be fair went to local kebab shop at about 4 clock and the guy, was a miserable twat, how he makes kebabs while fasting is beyond me.
Top Bottom